Double Benefit: Electricity and Nutrition from the Land

Double Benefit: Electricity and Nutrition from the Land

The demand for both food and electricity is set to increase dramatically in future. Concurrently, there will be less free space available. So why don’t we use arable land to produce both food and electricity at the same time? This would be possible using solar panels that produce electricity several meters above the ground. Plants that need shady conditions could grow beneath them.

Tuesday, August 9, 2022

The worldwide population growth is causing increasing demand for food. At the same time, however, more electricity will also be needed. This is all the more true for countries that want to break away from fossil fuels in the foreseeable future. Less gas and oil – i.e. decarbonization – means an increase in electrification. Against the background of the fact that usable land will also be scarcer, it makes sense to consider multiple use of agricultural land. According to the “Tages-Anzeiger” newspaper, one option in this area would be agrivoltaics.


Twofold Use

The idea: Solar panels can be installed on agricultural land that provide electricity and do not prevent plants from growing underneath at the same time. There are various options for setting up the panels. For example, three to five meters above the field. This means that there is still enough space for agricultural machinery to go underneath them. In pastures, cows could also graze under the panels. In the hot summer months they would have sufficient shade. Switzerland, with its numerous pastures, would be the perfect place to do this. However, it is also conceivable that the panels could be installed standing vertically with several meters of space between them. The challenge is to position the photovoltaic systems in such a way as to maximize both harvests and electricity production. It would also be conceivable to have mobile modules that could adjust to the sunlight according to the time of year. This would mean that in winter, when certain plants need less sun or the fields are fallow, electricity production could be maximized. In summer, the panels can be set up so that sufficient light gets to the plants.


Increasing Productivity

The idea of agrivoltaics improves land use efficiency. In certain cases, agricultural productivity can even be increased with solar panels. “There are examples where the productivity of agriculture has increased, in spite of the partial shade caused by the photovoltaic systems, because the micro-climate under the solar panels can be adjusted to the plants in a targeted manner,” Jürg Rohrer, Professor of Ecological Engineering at Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZUAS) in Wädenswil tells the “Tages-Anzeiger”.


Protection against Wind and Weather

The solar panels also protect the crops from wind and weather. Depending on the design, the systems provide protection from heat, hail, heavy rail or even frost. This could even make the technology attractive for winegrowers, who regularly have to battle hail and frost. Against the background of climate change with the increasing likelihood of extreme weather, agrivoltaics could be a way to mitigate the consequences, according to Rohrer in the “Tages-Anzeiger”. During a trial conducted by ZUAS in Wädenswil, researchers observed that in winter more lamb’s lettuce actually grew under the panels than in fields without panels. According to Rohrer, this is due to the fact that the temperature under the panels could be kept higher.


Switzerland Lagging Behind

In countries such as the Netherlands, France, Germany and the USA, agrivoltaics systems of various types are already in use. In some cases, for example in Germany, they are even state-funded. In spite of the huge potential of agrivoltaics, to date it has not been permitted in Switzerland. However, this could change in future thanks to the government’s amendment of the Raumplanungsverordnung [Land-use Planning Ordinance]. In actual fact, however, agrivoltaics systems may initially only be used in very restricted areas. This is because, among other things, there are clashes with landscape and nature conservation. But that is not the only problem. The government is also responsible for the shabby treatment of agrivoltaics according to Christian Wolf, Sales Manager at MBR Solar. According to the Federal Office for Agriculture (FOAG), systems of this kind can only be built if it can be proved that they offer added value for agriculture. This must be greater than the added value of energy production. “This means that agrivoltaics can actually only be considered for special crops such as berries. The contribution margin (CM) is present there, and extra agricultural yield can be achieved,” Wolf tells the “BauernZeitung” farming newspaper. In spite of huge potential, it is therefore possible that agrivoltaics systems will not be able to be installed with pip and stone fruits. This is because the coverage ratio there is three to four times lower. Wolf finds the FOAG’s position incomprehensible.


Gaining Valuable Experience

According to David Stickelberger from Swiss Solar, only sites close to residential areas are currently considered for agrivoltaics. This is because in other areas it would be necessary to lay long, expensive power lines. Alongside the problems with regulation, however, there is still a significant need for research in this area. This is because there has been no final clarification of how to optimize electricity production and food production in the same area. According to Jürg Rohrer, it is now important to set up a few large systems to gain experience. He says, “there is simply nothing better than gaining practical experience, otherwise you can often be talking at cross purposes.”

Related articles

Residue is not the same as residue
Media

Residue is not the same as residue

Painkillers like Voltaren are a blessing for us – yet in our rivers they can harm fish. If these were crop protection products, calls for bans would be immediate. It becomes clear that we are applying double standards.

ARTE documentary: Genetic engineering in organic farming?
Media

ARTE documentary: Genetic engineering in organic farming?

The ARTE documentary “Genetic engineering in organic farming?” examines key controversial questions of modern agriculture: Is the general exclusion of new breeding technologies still up to date? Can the resistance of organic farming be justified scientifically?

The Great Suffering of Farmers
Media

The Great Suffering of Farmers

Fire blight, Japanese beetles, or grapevine yellows – farmers in Valais, too, are increasingly feeling helpless in the face of the threats posed by nature. More and more often, they lack the means to effectively protect their crops. This makes it all the more important for the Federal Council to place a pragmatic balancing of interests at the forefront when setting threshold values.

'Tomatoes on your eyes'
Media

'Tomatoes on your eyes'

The submitted “Food Protection Initiative” calls for “GMO-free food.” Leaving aside this illusory demand, its adoption would mean more bureaucracy, more trade barriers, and less innovation. The Swiss Farmers’ Union describes the proposal as “unnecessary” and warns of a setback to the goal of achieving an even more sustainable agriculture.

More contributions from Media