More organic does not mean more biodiversity

More organic does not mean more biodiversity

It is widely believed that the promotion of the organic farming sector has a positive impact on biodiversity. But that is wrong. There are more species living on organic land – that is true. However, the amount of land used is significantly greater than in conventional agriculture. Biodiversity areas are being pushed back. All the benefits for biodiversity disappear.

Wednesday, September 15, 2021

According to a team of researchers at the University of Göttingen, the key to more biodiversity lies in a landscape mosaic of natural habitats and small and diverse areas of cultivation, as reported by "Landfreund". Whether it is organic or conventional plays no role: "Although the areas managed with eco-certification have a third more species, they do not achieve the yield level of conventional cultivation, so more area is needed for the same yield," says lead author Prof. Teja Tcharntke of the University of Göttingen.

Organic needs more space

To produce the same crop, organic farming needs much more land than conventional agriculture. The positive effects vanish again. And: Pesticides that have negative effects on living organisms are also used in the organic farming industry. Copper is widely used in organic farming for the control of fungal diseases. In the soil, it accumulates and has a toxic effect on many soil organisms – for example on worms. "Organic farming is not always carried out in idyllic family farms. Organic monocultures are often similar in size to conventional farms, and vegetables are often grown under glass at the expense of biodiversity," says Tcharntke in "Landfreund." In the Mediterranean region, entire landscapes for vegetable cultivation would be covered with plastic sheeting and thus destroyed – with a sharply increasing proportion of eco-certification.

Blindspot article

Large-scale sustainable food production and healthy eating are complex topics. They need to be viewed from different perspectives. Yet unpopular facts are all too often given short shrift in the public discussion. We illuminate the topics that usually remain in the shadows. This makes it possible for people with conflicting views to engage in a dialogue.

Smaller fields and variety

The variety of crops has a much greater influence on biodiversity. According to the study author, small fields with long edges and close-to-nature habitats had a stronger impact on biodiversity than eco-certification. They say that such areas could be equally feasible in both conventional and organic farming. A landscape with fields of the size of one hectare instead of six hectares can be home to six times more plant and insect species. At the same time, the number of species can be doubled with variety in cultivation. Biological pest control and the pollination performance of insects can also be improved in this way.

Good to know

Swiss agricultural policy is doing an above-average amount in terms of biodiversity compared to other countries. In barely any other country are the legal regulations more stringent than in Switzerland. Our agricultural area of around 1 million hectares covers more than 190,000 hectares of biodiverse conservation space. This represents 19 percent of the total area and represents a top international figure. Breeding birds are a good indicator of the state of biodiversity. According to pocket statistics for the environment 2020 (p. 33), the trend of bird species regularly breeding in Switzerland has been balanced over the last almost 30 years.


Networking of habitats

Biodiversity thrives on the networking of habitats. Wildflowers can be planted in each balcony box and each garden owner can contribute by creating habitats for insects and small animals, for example by means of planting shrubs and hedges, laying out piles of leaves and branches, and the late and staggered mowing of flower meadows. Ideally, the measures are adapted to the location: Vegetation and insects can be quite different just a short distance away. Help for location-appropriate wild plants is provided by the information platforms floretia.ch and www.futureplanter.ch

Related articles

Genetic scissors for the future – soon in Switzerland too?
Media

Genetic scissors for the future – soon in Switzerland too?

Genome editing is seen as a promising way to make agriculture more sustainable and climate-resilient. But Switzerland is hesitant to approve it. A popular initiative even wants to ban it. But what can CRISPR really do?

Less than 50 percent: How Switzerland is squandering its self-sufficiency
Media

Less than 50 percent: How Switzerland is squandering its self-sufficiency

Swiss agriculture is under enormous pressure. Extreme weather conditions, pests and increasingly stringent regulations are putting producers under strain. As a result, self-sufficiency is falling dramatically, especially for plant-based foods. To ensure food security in Switzerland, effective plant protection products are urgently needed.

Only half the truth in the genetic engineering debate
New Breeding Technologies Media

Only half the truth in the genetic engineering debate

Those who only see the risks remain blind to the opportunities offered by a new technology. Opponents of genetic engineering have presented a new survey on new breeding methods, which reveals some telling gaps.

«The FOAG is abandoning productive agriculture»
Media

«The FOAG is abandoning productive agriculture»

Increasing pests, missing tools, growing bureaucracy – the farmers' criticism of the federal government is loud and clear. Swiss agriculture is at its limit, reports Blick. The demand: effective plant protection products are urgently needed again.

More contributions from Media