«Genetic engineering and environmental protection go hand in hand»
Dr Teresa Koller works as a researcher at the Institute of Plant and Microbiology at the University of Zurich. For her, environmental protection and green genetic engineering are not opposites. People can fall ill. What many don’t realize is that plants can fall ill, too. And just like humans, they need protection from pathogens. The fight against plant diseases and pests is a daily struggle for millions of farmers around the world.
Thursday, November 12, 2020
For many years now, scientists at the University of Zurich Department of Plant and Microbial Biology have been investigating the immune system of cereal plants. Our goal with this research is to better understand the diverse interactions of plants and pathogens so that we can, ultimately, help better equip plants to ward off pests and disease. It’s a continuous race between the plants’ immune systems and the pathogens, which are constantly adapting to the immune system’s defenses. We plant biologists are helping farmers keep their crops healthy, now and in the future.
Fungal diseases are a powerful example as they can cause catastrophic crop loss. Farmers have a variety of options to fight these diseases. Crop protection products are essentially medicines for plants whose immune systems aren’t strong enough to ward off a pest or pathogen on their own. Of course, it is even better to prevent infection in the first place. At the Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, we are looking into ways to arm plant immune systems against specific pests and pathogens. With genetic engineering, particularly CRISPR/Cas9 technology – molecular scissors if you will – we can help plants win the fight against pests and disease in a way that is sustainable.
Right now, we are able to harvest resistance genes against fungal diseases like mildew and rust from certain wheat varieties and insert them in the genetic material of other wheat varieties or even other plants altogether, such as barley or maize. As a result, the plants are immune to the fungal diseases. In our test field in Reckenholz, we’re growing transgenic wheat, maize, and barley and evaluating their disease resistance in the field. It’s fascinating to see how the plants remain lush and green – in contrast to the plants that don’t have the protection. This work entails no risk to the environment. What we’re doing is identical to what would happen in nature except that we don’t have to wait for decades and rely on coincidence.
I myself was a member of Greenpeace when I was younger. Protecting the environment is something that I care a great deal about. I find the militant rejection of genetic engineering unfortunate. Genetic technology is often equated with some sort of «super vegetable» that’s been created artificially. But that has nothing to do with reality. Genetic engineering is not a silver bullet, but it’s also not the work of the devil. It is one of many approaches that can contribute to improving plant health. For me, environmentalism and genetic engineering are not mutually exclusive. On the contrary, genetic technology makes it possible to grow more crops with less space and less water while reducing the use of crop protection products. Society has to rethink its stance with respect to new advances in genetic engineering – for the sake of the environment and our climate. For that to happen, we need to inform people and engage in open dialogue. That is one task to which I would like to dedicate more of my time and energy, alongside my research, in the future.
Dr. Teresa Koller works in the Department of Plant and Microbial Biology at the University of Zurich. Photo: Madeleine Schoder/Landbote.
Related articles
The ideological misuse of «scientific» studies
Science serves as a basis for political decisions, including in nature conservation. However, a key question is: how trustworthy are the underlying studies and data? An article in the «NZZ am Sonntag» and the explanations provided by Quarks offer revealing perspectives on the quality of scientific studies and the possible misuse of figures.
Imports instead of regionality: tomato virus destroys domestic production
Although tomatoes and peppers are among the most popular vegetables in Switzerland, most of them are imported. Extreme weather conditions and diseases are to blame. The first companies have already developed resistant tomato varieties – but the federal government remains sceptical of new technologies.
Rapid further development of the genetic scissors
CRISPR-Cas has been used worldwide since 2012 to modify genes in organisms with pinpoint accuracy. With the help of protein engineering and AI algorithms, researchers at the University of Zurich have now developed a new, more compact ‘genetic scissors’. This and similar variants will make it possible to edit genes ever more efficiently.
More agrobiodiversity thanks to genome editing
It is often wrongly claimed that new breeding technologies such as genome editing restrict diversity in the seed market. A new study shows that the opposite is the case. Genome editing promotes agrobiodiversity.